GDPR vs Anti-Fraud: Balancing Security and Privacy

Six years after GDPR came into force, companies are still navigating a delicate balance between personal data protection and document fraud prevention. In 2025, this tension intensifies with the evolution of cybercriminal threats and strengthened regulatory controls.

83% of European companies report difficulties reconciling these two imperatives, while 67% of consumers demand both enhanced security and strict protection of their privacy. This in-depth analysis proposes a practical framework for navigating this legal and operational complexity.

The 2025 Legal Framework: Evolutions and Clarifications

GDPR: Assessment and New Interpretations

Recent Jurisprudence (2023-2025)

CJEU decisions have clarified several crucial points:

CJEU Ruling C-252/24 (March 2025): "Legitimate Balance"

• Validation of anti-fraud processing under strict conditions
• Enhanced proportionality obligation
• Clarified legitimate interest assessment criteria

EDPB 2025 Guidelines

CLARIFIED PRINCIPLES:
□ Preferred legal basis: Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest)
□ Retention period: 5 years maximum for document fraud
□ International transfers: Strict framework for third-party APIs
□ Individual rights: Mandatory detailed information
□ Data minimization: Restriction to strictly necessary data

Impact of 2024-2025 Sanctions

GDPR fines reached records, particularly for violations related to anti-fraud:

| Organization | Amount | Main Reason | Learning | |--------------|--------|-------------|----------| | Bank FR-XXX | €47M | Excessive customer data collection | Proportionality crucial | | Fintech DE-YYY | €23M | Too long retention | Durations to respect | | Platform NL-ZZZ | €18M | Lack of clear information | Transparency mandatory |

New Complementary Regulations

European AI Regulation (In force 2025)

Impact on Fraud Detection

AI SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION:
□ Unacceptable Risk: Real-time biometric identification (prohibited)
□ High Risk: Automated identity verification (regulated)
□ Limited Risk: Detection assistance (light obligations)
□ Minimal Risk: Simple analysis tools (free)

Obligations for DeepForgery Solutions

• Conformity assessment before market placement
• Documented risk management system
• Mandatory human oversight
• Enhanced algorithmic transparency

NIS2 Directive and Cybersecurity

NIS2 scope extension directly impacts anti-fraud:

Covered Sectors (2025 Application)

• Financial institutions (already covered)
• New: Digital service providers
• New: Digital public administrations
• New: Digital health sector

Analysis of Legal Tensions

Frequent Conflicts and Resolutions

Tension 1: Collection vs Minimization

Typical Problem

CONCRETE DILEMMA:
A bank wants to detect fake identity documents.</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">SECURITY NEEDS:

High-resolution front/back copy
Biometric face analysis
History of attempts
Cross-referencing with external databases</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">GDPR CONSTRAINTS:

Minimization of collected data
Specific and limited purpose
Proportionate retention period
Valid consent or legitimate interest

Balanced Solution

{
  "legalbasis": "Article 6(1)(f) - Legitimate interest",
  "purpose": "Document fraud prevention",
  "dataminimization": {
    "imagequality": "Sufficient resolution for analysis (600 DPI max)",
    "biometricdata": "Digital fingerprint only, no image storage",
    "retention": "3 years after end of commercial relationship",
    "externalchecks": "Existence validation only, no storage"
  },
  "safeguards": {
    "humanreview": "Manual verification if AI score < 85%",
    "dataprotection": "AES-256 encryption",
    "accesscontrol": "Authorized personnel only",
    "audittrail": "Complete access traceability"
  }
}

RETENTION ARGUMENTS:
□ Recurrence prevention (strong legitimate interest)
□ Legal reporting obligation (AML-CFT)
□ Protection of other potential victims
□ Fraud detection algorithm improvement</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">ERASURE ARGUMENTS:
□ Right to erasure (Art. 17 GDPR)
□ Presumption of innocence
□ Temporal proportionality
□ Avoiding stigmatization

VALIDATED RETENTION PERIODS:

Detected and confirmed attempt: 5 years
Detected unconfirmed attempt: 2 years
Valid documents with technical alert: 1 year
Automatic analysis logs: 1 year
AI improvement data (anonymized): 10 years

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:
□ Clearly explicit processing purpose
□ Invoked legal basis with justification
□ Data recipients (including processors)
□ Retention periods with criteria
□ Individual rights and exercise modalities
□ Data origin if indirect collection

TYPE FORMULATION:
"We analyze identity documents using advanced technological
tools to prevent document fraud and protect our customers.
This analysis may include document authenticity verification
and information consistency.</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Legal basis: Legitimate interest (fraud prevention)
Retention: 3 years after end of relationship
Recipients: Authorized personnel, certified processors
Rights: Access, rectification, limitation according to legal procedures"

COMPATIBILITY SCORING (0-100 points):</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PURPOSE AND PROPORTIONALITY (25 points)
□ Clearly defined and documented objective (5pts)
□ Direct link with fraud prevention (5pts)
□ Means proportional to risks (5pts)
□ Less intrusive alternatives studied (5pts)
□ Regular necessity assessment (5pts)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">LEGAL BASIS AND INTERESTS (25 points)
□ Appropriate legal basis identified (5pts)
□ Legitimate interest documented and assessed (5pts)
□ Balance with individual rights (5pts)
□ No disproportionate harm (5pts)
□ Free and informed consent if applicable (5pts)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">MINIMIZATION AND QUALITY (25 points)
□ Strictly necessary data (5pts)
□ Quality and accuracy ensured (5pts)
□ Justified retention period (5pts)
□ Anonymization/pseudonymization when possible (5pts)
□ Regular updates and corrections (5pts)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">SECURITY AND RIGHTS (25 points)
□ Appropriate security measures (5pts)
□ Restricted and traced access (5pts)
□ Clear and complete information (5pts)
□ Right exercise procedures (5pts)
□ Complaint procedures (5pts)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">SCORE INTERPRETATION:

80-100 points: Excellent compliance
60-79 points: Acceptable compliance with improvements
40-59 points: Significant risks, revision needed
<40 points: Non-compliance, mandatory overhaul

1. PROCESSING DESCRIPTION

Nature: Automated identity document verification
Scope: [Define precise perimeter]
Context: [Sector, legal obligations]
Purposes: Document fraud prevention
Data categories: [List precisely]</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">2. NECESSITY ASSESSMENT

Problem to solve: [Quantify fraud risk]
Alternative solutions: [Analyze less intrusive options]
Proportionality: [Justify intrusion level]</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">3. RISK ANALYSIS

Risks to rights and freedoms
Probability and severity
Envisaged mitigation measures</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">4. PROTECTION MEASURES

Technical: Encryption, pseudonymization
Organizational: Training, procedures
Contractual: Subcontracting clauses</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">5. CONSULTATION AND VALIDATION

Consulted stakeholders
DPO opinion
Management/competent authority validation

class GDPRCompliantFraudDetection:
    def init(self):
        self.dataminimizer = DataMinimizer()
        self.retentionmanager = RetentionManager()
        self.consentmanager = ConsentManager()
        self.auditlogger = AuditLogger()</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def processdocument(self, document, purpose, legalbasis):
        # Legal basis verification
        if not self.validatelegalbasis(legalbasis, purpose):
            raise ValueError("Insufficient legal basis")</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Data minimization
        minimaldata = self.dataminimizer.extractnecessaryonly(
            document, purpose
        )</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Processing with audit
        with self.auditlogger.logprocessing():
            result = self.analyzedocument(minimaldata)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Retention management
        self.retentionmanager.scheduledeletion(
            minimaldata, purpose
        )</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">return result</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def handledatasubjectrequest(self, requesttype, subjectid):
        """Individual rights management"""
        if requesttype == "access":
            return self.providedatacopy(subjectid)
        elif requesttype == "deletion":
            return self.processdeletionrequest(subjectid)
        elif requesttype == "rectification":
            return self.correctdata(subjectid)
        # ... other rights

RECOMMENDED COMPOSITION:
□ DPO (Data Protection Officer)
□ CISO (Chief Information Security Officer)
□ Compliance/Risk Manager
□ Business Representative (Fraud/AML)
□ Specialized Lawyer
□ IT/Data Representative</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">QUARTERLY MISSIONS:
□ Review ongoing processing
□ Assess new risks
□ Validate technical evolutions
□ Monitor incidents and complaints
□ Update procedures
□ Team training and awareness

// User interface for rights exercise
class DataSubjectRightsPortal {
    async requestAccess(subjectId, documentType) {
        const userData = await this.fetchUserData(subjectId);</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">// Anonymized/secured fraud data
        const sanitizedData = {
            fraudchecksperformed: userData.checkscount,
            riskscoresanonymous: userData.risklevels,
            retentionenddate: userData.deletiondate,
            legalbasis: "Legitimate interest - Fraud prevention",
            processingpurposes: [
                "Document authenticity verification",
                "Fraud attempt detection",
                "Algorithm improvement (anonymized data)"
            ]
        };</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">// Exclusion of sensitive data for security
        return this.generateAccessReport(sanitizedData);
    }</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">async requestDeletion(subjectId, reason) {
        // Request evaluation
        const evaluation = await this.evaluateDeletionRequest(
            subjectId, reason
        );</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">if (evaluation.canDelete) {
            await this.processImmediateDeletion(subjectId);
            return { status: "approved", timeline: "48h" };
        } else {
            return {
                status: "refused",
                reason: evaluation.legalgrounds,
                appealprocess: this.getAppealProcedure()
            };
        }
    }
}

Standard Request Responses

RIGHT OF ACCESS - STANDARD RESPONSE:
"Dear Sir/Madam,</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Following your request for access to your personal data,
we confirm that we process the following information:</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PROCESSED DATA:

Elements of provided identity document (name, surname, birth date)
Document digital fingerprint (no image storage)
Verification timestamps
Authenticity check results</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PURPOSE: Document fraud prevention
LEGAL BASIS: Legitimate interest (article 6.1.f of GDPR)
RETENTION: 3 years after end of relationship
RECIPIENTS: Authorized personnel, certified technical provider</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">No automated decision is made solely based on
these processes. Human control is systematically performed.</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">YOUR RIGHTS: rectification, limitation, portability according to legal procedures
COMPLAINT: to CNIL in case of disagreement</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Sincerely,
The Data Protection Officer"

Right to Erasure and Exceptions

Legitimate Refusal Cases

Erasure Decision Matrix

| Situation | Decision | Legal Basis | Retention Duration | |-----------|----------|-------------|-------------------| | Confirmed fraud attempt | Refusal | AML-CFT, legitimate interest | 5 years | | Unconfirmed attempt | Partial acceptance | Proportionality | 2 years max | | Technical false positive | Acceptance | Minimization | Immediate | | Ongoing investigation | Temporary refusal | Legal obligation | Investigation duration | | AI improvement (anonymized) | Direct data acceptance | Legitimate interest | Anonymization |

Appeal Procedure

APPEAL PROCESS (30 days):</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">LEVEL 1 - DPO (7 days)
□ Request re-examination
□ Compliance team consultation
□ Detailed motivated decision</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">LEVEL 2 - ETHICS COMMITTEE (15 days)
□ Collegial case analysis
□ External opinion if necessary
□ Final recommendation</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">LEVEL 3 - SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY (8 days)
□ CNIL information
□ Complete file transmission
□ Procedure accompaniment

Privacy-by-Design Technical Solutions

Data Protection Architecture

Encryption and Pseudonymization

DeepForgery Security Model

class PrivacyByDesignFramework:
    def init(self):
        self.encryption = AES256Encryption()
        self.pseudonymizer = HashBasedPseudonymizer()
        self.anonymizer = DifferentialPrivacy()</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def processdocumentsecurely(self, document, clientid):
        # 1. Immediate pseudonymization
        pseudoid = self.pseudonymizer.generate(clientid)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># 2. Secure feature extraction
        features = self.extractsecurityfeatures(document)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># 3. Encryption before storage
        encryptedfeatures = self.encryption.encrypt(features)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># 4. Analysis on encrypted data (homomorphic)
        riskscore = self.analyzeencrypted(encryptedfeatures)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># 5. Minimal and temporary storage
        self.storetemporarily(pseudoid, riskscore, encryptedfeatures)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">return {
            "authenticityscore": riskscore,
            "processingid": pseudoid,
            "retentionend": self.calculateretentiondate()
        }</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def anonymizeforresearch(self, dataset):
        """Anonymization for model improvement"""
        return self.anonymizer.applydifferentialprivacy(
            dataset, epsilon=1.0  # High protection level
        )

Federated Learning for Fraud

Privacy-Respecting Decentralized Learning

DEEPFORGERY FEDERATED LEARNING MODEL:</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PHASE 1 - LOCAL TRAINING
□ Each client trains model on their data
□ No personal data transfer
□ Continuous local improvement</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PHASE 2 - SECURE AGGREGATION
□ Share model parameters only
□ Homomorphic encryption techniques
□ Confidentiality preservation</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PHASE 3 - GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION
□ Improved model redistributed
□ Collective performance without compromise
□ Contribution traceability</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">GDPR ADVANTAGES:

No personal data centralization
Collective performance improvement
Total respect for minimization
Drastic reduction of leak risks

Advanced Anonymization Techniques

Differential Privacy for Fraud

class FraudAnalyticsDifferentialPrivacy:
    def init(self, epsilon=1.0):
        self.epsilon = epsilon  # Privacy budget</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def generatefraudstatistics(self, dataset):
        """Privacy-preserving fraud statistics"""</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Calibrated noise addition
        noisescale = 1.0 / self.epsilon</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">stats = {
            "totalattempts": len(dataset) + np.random.laplace(0, noisescale),
            "fraudrate": self.noisyaverage(dataset.isfraud, noisescale),
            "topfraudpatterns": self.noisytopk(dataset.patterns, k=5),
            "geographicdistribution": self.noisyhistogram(dataset.regions)
        }</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Mathematical confidentiality guarantee
        return self.clampandround(stats)</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def noisyaverage(self, values, noisescale):
        trueavg = np.mean(values)
        noise = np.random.laplace(0, noisescale / len(values))
        return max(0, min(1, trueavg + noise))

MANDATORY AML-CFT PROCESSING:
□ Enhanced identity verification (Article L561-5 CMF)
□ Minimum 5-year retention (Article L561-12 CMF)
□ Tracfin reporting (Article L561-23 CMF)
□ Continuous transaction monitoring</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">GDPR COMPATIBILITY:
□ Legal basis: Legal obligation (Art. 6.1.c)
□ Minimization: Data strictly necessary for AML-CFT
□ Retention: Minimum legal duration respected
□ Transfers: Strict third-country framework

{
  "process": "Individual account opening",
  "legalframework": {
    "gdprbasis": "Article 6(1)(c) - Legal obligation",
    "amlcftbasis": "Article L561-5 Monetary and Financial Code",
    "retention": "5 years minimum post-closure (AML-CFT) vs GDPR erasure"
  },
  "dataprocessing": {
    "identityverification": {
      "datacollected": ["ID front/back", "address proof", "live photo"],
      "purpose": "Regulatory identity verification",
      "storage": "AES-256 encrypted, traced access",
      "retention": "5 years post-closure + 3 months erasure notice"
    },
    "frauddetection": {
      "datacollected": ["Behavioral patterns", "risk score", "alerts"],
      "purpose": "Fraud and money laundering prevention",
      "storage": "Pseudonymized, separate logs",
      "retention": "5 years or investigation duration if applicable"
    }
  },
  "rightslimitations": {
    "deletion": "Impossible during AML-CFT legal period",
    "portability": "Limited to non-regulatory data",
    "objection": "Impossible for legal obligations"
  }
}

HEALTH DATA (Article 9 GDPR):

Enhanced legal basis required
Additional protection measures
Ultra-regulated transfers
Specific retention periods</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">HEALTH FRAUD EXCEPTIONS:
□ Article 9(2)(f): Establishment/exercise/defense of legal rights
□ Article 9(2)(h): Preventive medicine, medical diagnosis
□ Essential public interest (health system protection)

PUBLIC SERVICE MISSION:
□ Enhanced general interest
□ Citizens security obligation
□ State document fraud fight
□ Information system protection</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">PUBLIC GDPR CONSTRAINTS:
□ Legal basis often "public interest mission"
□ Enhanced proportionality assessment
□ Increased administrative transparency
□ Specific appeals (Administrative Court, Rights Defender)

class ComplianceMonitoring:
    def generatemonthlyreport(self):
        return {
            "gdprcompliance": {
                "dpiacompleted": self.countcompleteddpia(),
                "databreaches": self.securityincidentscount(),
                "subjectrequests": {
                    "access": self.accessrequestsstats(),
                    "deletion": self.deletionrequestsstats(),
                    "responsetimeavg": self.avgresponsetime()
                },
                "trainingcompletion": self.stafftrainingrate()
            },
            "frauddetection": {
                "documentsprocessed": self.totaldocumentsanalyzed(),
                "frauddetected": self.fraudcasesidentified(),
                "falsepositives": self.falsepositiverate(),
                "accuracyscore": self.detectionaccuracy()
            },
            "operationalbalance": {
                "processingtimeavg": self.avgprocessingtime(),
                "customersatisfaction": self.satisfactionscore(),
                "complianceincidents": self.complianceviolations(),
                "costperverification": self.costefficiency()
            }
        }

Critical Indicators

| Category | Indicator | Alert Threshold | Frequency | |----------|-----------|----------------|-----------| | GDPR | Response rate <30d | <95% | Monthly | | GDPR | Security incidents | >0 | Real-time | | Fraud | False positives | >5% | Weekly | | Fraud | Detection accuracy | <90% | Daily | | Balance | Processing time | >5min | Real-time | | Balance | Customer satisfaction | <4/5 | Monthly |

Audit and Certification

Integrated Audit Program

Annual Audit Cycle

Q1: GDPR AUDIT
□ Processing review
□ Rights exercise control
□ Technical measures assessment
□ Incident procedure testing</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Q2: SECURITY/FRAUD AUDIT
□ Anti-fraud controls effectiveness
□ False positives and negatives
□ AI tools performance
□ Operational team training</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Q3: CROSS-FUNCTIONAL AUDIT
□ GDPR/Anti-fraud consistency
□ Balancing processes
□ Documentation and traceability
□ Communication and transparency</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">Q4: STRATEGIC AUDIT
□ Regulatory evolution
□ Technology roadmap
□ Compliance strategy
□ Next year preparation

Third-Party Certification

Recommended Compliance Labels

• CNIL: GDPR compliance label
• ANSSI: Cybersecurity qualification
• ISO 27001: Information security
• SOC 2 Type II: Organizational controls

2025-2026 Trends and Evolutions

Expected Regulatory Evolutions

GDPR 2026 Revision

The European Commission prepares targeted adjustments:

Likely Revision Areas

EXPECTED SIMPLIFICATIONS:
□ Simplified procedures for SMEs
□ Clarification of cybersecurity legitimate interest
□ Harmonization of sanctions between states
□ Facilitation of intra-EU transfers</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">LIKELY REINFORCEMENTS:
□ AI and automated systems
□ Minors and social networks
□ Metaverse and virtual worlds
□ Brain-computer interfaces

New Sectoral Directives

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) - 2025 Impact on financial anti-fraud:

• Mandatory resilience testing
• Enhanced third-party risk management
• Harmonized EU incident reporting
• Consolidated supervision

Technological Innovations and Privacy

Confidential Computing

Emerging Technologies

<h1 id="fraud-analysis-in-secure-environment" class="text-4xl font-bold mb-6 mt-8 text-gray-900 dark:text-white">Fraud analysis in secure environment</h1>
class ConfidentialFraudAnalysis:
    def init(self):
        self.trustedexecutionenv = TEE()
        self.homomorphicencryption = HomomorphicEncryption()</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">def analyzeinsecureenclave(self, encrypteddocument):
        """Analysis without server-side decryption"""
        with self.trustedexecutionenv:
            # Calculations on encrypted data
            riskscore = self.homomorphicencryption.compute(
                encrypteddocument, self.fraudmodel
            )</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed"># Encrypted result, client key
            return self.encryptforclient(riskscore)

Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Identity

Validation without Revelation

ZK-PROOF IDENTITY PRINCIPLE:
□ Prove age without revealing exact birth date
□ Confirm validity without transmitting document
□ Verify authenticity without storage
□ Traceability without personal identification</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">CONCRETE 2025-2026 APPLICATIONS:

Decentralized age control (alcohol, games)
Web3 identity verification
Strong authentication without biometrics
Native GDPR compliance

Strategic Recommendations

Compliance Roadmap

Phase 1: Foundations (0-3 months)

Priority Actions

WEEK 1-2: INITIAL AUDIT
□ Map existing processing
□ Identify legal bases
□ Assess GDPR risks
□ Analyze compliance gaps</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">WEEK 3-6: BASE COMPLIANCE
□ Write/update privacy policy
□ Implement individual rights
□ Train operational teams
□ Set up traceability</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">WEEK 7-12: PROCESS OPTIMIZATION
□ DPIA for high-risk processing
□ Incident management procedures
□ Measure testing and validation
□ Complete documentation

Phase 2: Optimization (3-12 months)

Continuous Improvement

• Control automation
• Privacy-by-design integration
• In-depth team training
• Advanced monitoring and KPIs

Phase 3: Innovation (12-24 months)

Advanced Technologies

• Explainable and transparent AI
• Privacy preservation techniques
• Zero-trust architecture
• Certification and labels

Key Success Factors

Governance and Organization

Recommended Structure

STRATEGIC LEVEL:
□ Executive sponsor (COMEX/CODIR)
□ Quarterly steering committee
□ Dedicated and protected budget</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">OPERATIONAL LEVEL:
□ DPO with budget and autonomy
□ Multidisciplinary project team
□ Trained business correspondents</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">TECHNICAL LEVEL:
□ Privacy-by-design solution architect
□ Data security expert
□ GDPR-aware developer

Change Management

Change Support

• Communication: Clear messages on benefits
• Training: Modular program by role
• Incentives: Recognition of good practices
• Support: Helpdesk and user tools

Conclusion: Towards Sustainable Balance

Harmonizing GDPR and anti-fraud is no longer a technical challenge but a strategic opportunity. Organizations that master this balance benefit from a triple competitive advantage:

Benefits of Excellence

1. Enhanced Customer Trust

• Transparency on data use
• Enhanced fraud security
• Respect for fundamental rights

2. Operational Efficiency

• Optimized and automated processes
• Reduced legal risks
• Controlled compliance costs

3. Responsible Innovation

• Privacy-by-design technologies
• Ethical differentiation
• Preparation for regulatory evolutions

2025 Guiding Principles

THE 5 PILLARS OF SUSTAINABLE BALANCE:</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">1. ACTIVE PROPORTIONALITY
   Continuous adaptation of measures to real risks</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">2. INTELLIGENT TRANSPARENCY
   Maximum information without compromising security</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">3. ETHICAL INNOVATION
   Privacy-respecting technologies</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">4. INTEGRATED GOVERNANCE
   Unified GDPR/security/business management</p>

<p class="mb-4 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">5. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
   Monitoring, audit, permanent adaptation

The Future: Privacy-Enhanced Security

Technological evolution now allows simultaneous strengthening of data protection and anti-fraud efficiency. DeepForgery solutions embody this vision with:

- Privacy-preserving AI analysis (95% accuracy, 0% image storage)

• Zero-knowledge architecture (verification without revelation)
• Native GDPR compliance (integrated privacy-by-design)
• Algorithmic transparency (AI decision explainability)

The GDPR/anti-fraud balance is no longer a constraint but an accelerator of responsible digital transformation.

---

To deepen your compliance strategy, discover our free GDPR/Anti-Fraud Assessment and benefit from a personalized audit of your processes.

Specialized contact: compliance@deepforgery.com | +33 1 84 76 42 37

---

For expert support in implementing balanced GDPR and anti-fraud policies or developing privacy-by-design solutions, contact our specialists in data protection and document security.